Selasa, 25 Juni 2013

Epson Artisan 1430 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CB53201)


Customer Reviews

Here’s To Your New Photo Printing Addiction

  June 8, 2012
By Canis Majoris
I rarely give 5-stars to a printer because there are usually aspects within its usage that are done only satisfactory–trying to functionally get by. The Epson Artisan 1430 is an HD photo printer and it should be reviewed under only that guise.
—Summarical Thought—
This printer gives extremely high quality print-outs on photo paper when using high resolution images. The print time is somewhat lengthy though the outcome is worth the effort. There is a minimalist approach to unboxing and use, for there are very few steps to get the Epson working. It is fairly quick to set-up wirelessly through the included software. There are no negatives that stick out, except maybe subjectively, to claim there are lacking points or better options. If what you want is a way to print high-quality photos the Epson Artisan 1430 is nothing but this.
—Printing Quality—
I used fairly inexpensive Semi-Gloss photo paper that was not a ‘premium’ grade nor an Epson brand.
Photo Quality on Photo Paper: 9/10
Settings used: Quality Option: ‘Best Photo’ Print Options: All Boxes Unchecked *Under Advanced Tab*: All Boxes Unchecked under Print Options
When printing photos out, I looked for resolutions at least 1 megapixel or more–at least 1024×786–and blew the pictures up to make a 4*8.5×11 poster. The latter was done using Picasa by Google and something I strongly suggest doing if you get this printer. That is one of the fun things that you can do with a printer that accurately replicates photos/pictures/paintings on paper–you can do a lot of interesting decorations/projects. My idea was to find some of my favorite paintings online and print them out to use around the house–which this printer did exceptionally well at. It is for this fact that I can really give you a good idea on the print quality of this printer. The lower the resolution of course the less clear and precise the photos/pictures were when enlarged.
Comparing to the original picture on my laptop screen, the pictures printed out where actually better quality with better contrast and colors. I do know my LED screen is not too good, but the pictures were extremely vibrant and saturated correctly. Printing paintings from Monet to Van Gogh as well actual pictures, the accuracy was outstanding.
Printing black and white text on plain paper, the Artisan did not have the sharp angles and abyss black that a laser printer would have though the text was fairly decent with a slightly washed out black and compact angles around the letters.
B/W Quality: 7/10
—Ink…& Usage—
**Important**
The Epson Artisan 1430 takes Epson cartridge 79 which is high-capacity. After going to the store and seeing Epson 78 next to the 79 with the label: ‘Standard Capacity’ and 30% less in the cost, I thought that this would be an option for someone wanting to print just a few more photos. Even the employee thought the 78 would fit in the Artisan. This is not the case. The cartridges look identical except for 1 strip of plastic that blocks the ability to slide it in the cartridge holder all the way. Well, I decided to ‘snip’ the extra plastic boundary and it proceeded to fit perfectly. When going to prime the ink, however, I found that the printer would not recognize the ink. Not sure why Epson did not want the 78 to be used in the printer, but it will not in anyway take anything other than Epson 79.
The cartridges are around 22$ a piece and the Epson needs 6: Black, Yellow, Light Magenta, Light Cyan, Dark Magenta, and Dark Cyan. When printing many colored photos the most used where the Light Magenta and Light Cyan. I printed around 40 or so ‘highest’ quality full size (8.5×11) print-outs before the L. Magenta and L. Cyan ran out. Yellow was on its way. If you plan to use this for many photos, go ahead and buy some replacement L.Magenta and L.Cyan cartridges. If you are planning on printing 5″x7″ or smaller photos, this ink will last a very very long time. If I had to guess at the latter I would say you would at least get 120 printouts before running empty.
—Print Time—
The print time was fairly slow and this is due to me selecting the highest possible quality and deselecting the ‘fast print’ option (don’t know if that helps quality or not). It took about 7-8 minutes to finish printing a full size photo.
—Operation—
Very simple to use. The wireless setup is the most complicated but this is lessened due to the software included with the Artisan. You have the choice of using the included CD to install software on your computer–and setup the wireless connection–or you can download it from Epson’s website. Some printers have you follow a manual to setup the wireless connection, but the Epson, through the software, is automated. You have the option to connect via an AccessPoint (which is sometimes difficult to find), or you can input a wireless key. I did find it difficult to setup multiple connections because after you first connect to your router, I could not find how to add another connection without installing and re-installing the software.
The printer is very very quiet, equal to a loud whisper and is stable when on a table. It is wide, somewhat heavy (25 lbs or 11kg), and takes up a lot of space (25″ or 63cm wide).
This printer will not be just something in your house that prints things but can really encourage a hobby in creating posters, decorating the house, and forming photo albums/collages. Be warned that with the high quality photos might also come an addiction to inundate your place of living with many pictures. The reasonable price makes this a very good value.

First one I got was DOA but EPSON replaced fast, prints are awesome

  May 8, 2012
By Kilgore Gagarin "Those who believe in telekin…
I’ve already read two OTHER reviews of this printer that had the exact same problem out of the box: namely, the paper jam signal is blinking (indicating a paper jam – duh) and will not clear no matter what you do. The EPSON support was timely (I had to wait 5 minutes on a weeknight for tech support) and some of the best I’ve had. In the end, they determined the bogus paper jam light was unsolveable and they had to send me a replacement. I received it by FEDEX 2 days later. They also let me keep the original printer’s ink cartridges and sent me 6 new ones, so I was able to do some “free” testing as to ink capacity (see below). With the replacement printer I had ZERO problems with easy setup; no horizontal striping on the prints; all colors solid and vibrant.
Pros:
* Excellent tech support and hand holding.
* Stunning pro quality prints on Epson High-Gloss Paper
* Beautiful prints on Epson Matte Presentation Paper
* Problem free push one button setup with WPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup)
* Included copy of Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 (Win/Mac)
* Some of the best, friendliest, and fastest support I’ve ever received
Cons:
* Obvious bad initial batch of DOA printers WHICH MUST BE FIXED
* Power cord has tendency to come out of printer
* Sparse documentation in box (newbies beware)
Things to note:
* Big footprint (which is necessary for a big format printer)
* If you don’t have WPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup) capable router, wireless setup may be a problem
* USB printer cable is NOT included but would be useful
* Specialized ink and paper is more expensive than usual home printing supplies (don’t be surprised)
* Paper feed support for 13 x 19 inch is a bit short for thin matte paper which “flops over”
I set this up with WPS before I installed any software, which was not in the included documentation. My experience told me to set up with WPS before installing drivers as the printer is just registering with the router. Just push the WPS button on your router (if it has one) and then push the button on your printer within 2 minutes. When I subsequently installed the included software and commenced setup, it asked me if I knew where my printer was and finding it on the network was trivial. Nowhere does it say to do WPS first, and I suspect some people will have setup problems if they don’t do WPS first (or don’t have a WPS router). I had no need of a USB cable for setup.
Also, though the wireless connectivity is nice, you may have issues with it later as I did. It’s likely that the printer was too far away from my router and the connection may have dropped (yes, my fault). So, out of 25 wirelessly printed posters, 2 stopped printing in the middle and I wasted a couple of premium photo sheets. (NOTE ADDED: Large files printed in high quality on glossy paper cause most problems. Same photo printed on matte paper is no problem. Wi-fi bandwidth or packet issue? Maybe.Problem does NOT occur with USB connection.) USB cable connection was rock solid. I highly recommend getting the inexpensive matte paper while you setup and learn to use the printer. Alternatively, just do setup and testing with regular 8.5 x 11 inch inkjet paper.
When replacing my printer, Epson let me keep the original six cartridges and sent me six new ones as well (like I said, nice support!) so I experimented with quantity. I was able to print thirty 13 x 19 prints before two of the cartridges ran out: light cyan and light magenta. The other cartridges are at varying levels, with black being about one quarter full. It’s difficult to say what mileage you will get since it depends upon what you print – I did black and white prints, color photographs, and movie posters (Wikimedia Commons has a great high def Boris Karloff “The Mummy” with some complex coloring). Each of the six ink cartridges will be individually replaced, not all at once. You might want to invest in a second set, and then replace each individually as they run out. Light cyan and light magenta are the colors most likely to need replacement the most often. Black if you do a lot of bitonal printing (large text posters).
I printed on one sheet of non-Epson glossy photo paper and 2 hours later the ink was smudging. When Epson recommends that you use their own paper, take that to heart. The Epson papers are dry and solid right out of the printer.
Based on my experience so far, I have a rule of thumb that a single 13 x 19 inch photo quality print on premium paper will cost about $3 to $5. That might be higher than reality, but it still gives me a good feel for single print expenses.
I love this printer and would have probably given 5 out of 5 stars had it worked initially. The hand writing is on the wall that there’s something awry with some of these early shipments, but Epson responded like a champ and replaced it quickly.
Lots of friends and family are going to get gifts this year of beautiful 13 x 19 inch prints of houses, babies, and cats. Cheers!

Not working out of box

  February 25, 2012
By Paul Lamb
Brand new printer out of box, put the ink cartridges that came with it in and then it powered itself off. When I turned it back on I get a flashing power light, flashing paper light and solid ink light. Epson was very pleasant to talk to, they had no idea what was wrong and are sending me a new one. Hopefully the next one is better.
Update: Received replacement printer in 2 days later. Works great. Print quality is excellent and it’s fast. I’m going to change my rating on this too.

GREAT PRINTER

  May 20, 2012
By M. Burgos
I bought this printer for a few reasons, and will rate each point separately:
1. Wide format: I do a lot of 13×19 and 11×17 printing. A wide format printer was a necessity for me. There are about a dozen or so wide format printers on the market (or is it large format, with wide format being 24″ or wider? I forgot). Epson has always made a good wide format printer. This is now my 3rd model over 11 years.
2. Price: The price is always important to me. This cost me under $300 and for a wide format printer with these specs, an excellent value.
3. Separate color ink cartridges: I print a lot of blue and black in my work, so it’s important to be able to replace these colors frequently without having to replace the entire color cartridge. This will save me money.
4. Print quality: I need a printer that is going to give me exceptional print quality. The highest print quality setting gives me what I am looking for. The colors are stunning.
5. Paper: I love Epson’s premium luster line of papers. They are gorgeous. I always buy Epson’s brand of papers and have a stock of various sizes.
Things not important to me: speed wireless printing. I would have connected the printer to my print server (which is also wireless). The built-in wireless saved me the hassle (and my print server is a hassle when I add a new printer to it). The speed is fine, and I didn’t notice any slow-down when printing wirelessly versus via USB.
I am not saying that speed and wireless printing are not important, they are just not important for me. I am of the mind that you can’t have it all, and that in high-end graphic arts printing, you almost always sacrifice speed for quality.
If I were able to remove a half star it would be for not including a small assortment of paper samples. It was always a nice surprise to open that in any new printer, almost like the toy in Cracker Jacks. Don’t be cheap Epson!!!
I highly recommend this printer, and with it, Epson premium luster papers. You won’t be disappointed.

Excellent prints, Expensive ink!

  March 25, 2012
By Sam Archer
Size: First, this printer is BIG and it’s heavy.
You can load many types of paper including up to 13X19″ which is very wide format paper. You can print onto envelopes and it comes with an attachment to print CD/DVD labels too.
Setup: This printer is wireless meaning you can print over wi-fi from any room in your house and don’t need to have the printer attached to a computer. We put the printer in the closet and print from our laptop, desktops, and ipad/iphones and it works great.
You need a USB cable (it doesn’t come with it) for the initial wi-fi setup unless your router has the WPS symbol on it (ours didn’t). With the install CD, running Windows 7, and using an Airport Extreme router, installation was done in under 10min with no problems.
Printing: Printing from windows or Photoshop is very easy. Photoshop CS5, and other versions, has settings for this printer already loaded and it makes really great photographic prints. Prints done directly from windows are also easy to do.
The initial setting is for speed printing but if you change the default setting to the slower print and specify quality paper, it makes a huge difference in print quality. At highest settings, printing a 22 megapixel picture from my Canon 5D Mark II, with a color 8.5 x 11″ glossy photo paper, it took under 3 minutes to print a photograph. I had no problem with paper jamming and loading paper is very easy.
Print Quality: I used Epson photo quality glossy paper and the quality is better than expected. I get prints from Kodak online and shutterfly and these pictures are at least as good or better in color reproduction and sharpness. With the Epson premium luster paper the prints look even better. These prints are almost as good as the prints I get sometimes from mpix.com for my highest quality images and special presentations. It really depends on the photo paper.
The ink instantly dry to the touch without any smudging right out of the printer.
Cost: The printer itself is reasonable priced for what it is. The ink is where it gets costly. The replacement inks are 6 individual color cartridges that are easily changed, snap in and out. The cost 19.99 for black, and 21.99 for the other colors at this time. So if you need to replace all 6 inks you are looking at over $120 which is a lot of money.
Mobile printing: You can print to this printer with your iOS device like Ipad or Iphones with the Epson iprint app. Using my Iphone 4GS, I printed pictures and documents. You even have access to the advanced settings like paper quality, etc. Setup was literally as easy as downloading the app, picking the printer, and pressing print. Really impressive.
Conclusion:
Excellent prints with quality rivaling that of professional print shops that I have used. The quality is only limited by the quality of paper you use.
The setup is very easy.
The mobile printing from my iphone and Ipad is really a very nice added bonus feature!

Great Printer at a great price!!!!!

  March 29, 2013
By David Laughing Horse Robinson
As an Artist this is the printer of a lifetime. It is picture perfect and its processing time is much faster than I have used before. Try it and you have believe.

Absolutely The Best Value In A Large Format Printer

  February 7, 2013
By glr "glr"
The Artisan 1430 replaces my tried-and-true Epson 2000 which finally gave up the ghost after years of incredible (but slow) printing service.
I decided to take a chance on the Artisan 1430 and am incredibly pleased. The quality of the prints, even on moderately priced gloss and pearl papers(not Epson) is astounding, and of course leaves the old Epson in the “technology dust”. 8.5 x 11 in less than 2 minutes and 11 x 17 in about 8 (at highest quality settings).
Wireless setup was very quick and simple (thanks to WPS), and took all of 15 minutes including drivers. Almost plug-n-play by printer standards.
Amazon gets kudos, as well, for very fast (Prime) shipment.
I would recommend this printer to anyone expecting professional quality prints at a very reasonable price. Well done Epson.
UPDATE: Just continues to amaze. Ink has lasted through 12-8×10′s, 3-11×17′s and 1-13×44. Yes you can print large pano’s (13 x 44) using rolled paper precut to length. Epson $50 rebate was a nice perk as well.

Impressive Printer

  November 23, 2012
By Mitch DeCanter
The Epson Artisan 1430 is a replacement for a larger Epson 4000 which served in a professional photo studio for several years well. Studio now closed, I searched for a replacement of the 4000 only when it went to sleep and I could not revive due to cost. Down sizing and wanting something that I could count on: The Artisan 1430 met all my demands and the quality of the prints is wonderful with good costing ink. I am pleased…Just miss the 17 inch wide printing…

Excellent prints.

  March 26, 2013
By Mark A. Stribling "StribWings.com"
I got this printer to make 13X19 prints from my photography. This printer delivers great quality photographs. Pretty fast, quiet, very high quality images. It sucks up the ink (to be expected) but it takes Amazon’s generic cartridges and I use Canon Photo paper plus glossy II, also from Amazon and it ends up costing me less than $2 per 13X19 print including paper and ink.
No problems yet after about 50 large prints except 2 misfeeds.

Epson PictureMate Deluxe Viewer Edition Photo Printer


Customer Reviews

Absolutely great portable printer!

  June 9, 2005
By inlvnv
I’ve returned the HP375b printer for this one, and what an amazing printer. No more going to a photo lab or uploading to online photo labs, this 6 color ink printer produces stunning pictures everytime. I got a battery with this printer, and it is amazing how convenient it is to just take the printer and the camera whereever I want to be, then just sit and print. As they’ve indicated, the pictures are smudge and waterproof, making it easier to handle right after printing them. The 6 color ink cartridge is a single unit, and it is a cinch to change them when needed.
The printer has a USB port in the back that can be used to connect to a PC or other USB devices for backup or from which to read the pictures to print. I’ve never had the chance to backup the pictures from memory cards to a CD-writer, as my memory cards are at least 1GB each and have found the CD writers to be past its time. However, the printer did not have any problem reading from other USB flash cards or from my 60Gig portable hard drive. A support to write to a DVD writer would be a plus with possibly from next firmware release of this printer.
Only inconvenient thing the others may find is that the Pict Bridge connection is located on the back of the printer, rather than the front, where it is more convenient to handle the wires. I, however, found that it is more convenient to just take the memory card out of the camera and plug it into the printer cardreader.
I don’t like wires, and all my devices, including my laptops, are portable, so this printer is a great addition to my overall system. This is a must have item if you love taking pictures, and a battery is a must have accessory.

A-M-A-Z-I-N-G!

  June 6, 2005
By V. Koeblitz
This product is incredible. I know photography, and I’m fussy about quality- these pictures honestly look like they were professionally developed. Plus, with the new color screen on the delux model, it is SO easy to look through your pictures and decide which to print. It’s also incredibly easy to zoom in and crop the pictures before you print them! If you have a digital camera, you NEED this printer so that your pictures dont just sit in a folder on your computer, yet you dont have to go out to print them. A must buy!

Very Impressive

  September 28, 2005
By Jose M. Marrinhas
I am an avid photographer who always and I guess still prefer to use film However, come to modern age, the digital medium has come a long way and in most cases replaced film in many aspects.
After buying my 7.1 Canon G6, I wanted to have something to print 4×6′s on just as I would have in the lab. I’m not all about keeping them on a disc and seeing it in my monitor. There’s something about holding the art in your hand and easily showing it to someone. Well, I sought to buy a printer to do only that- Job specific.
After reading various reviews, the Epson Picturemate Deluxe as well as it’s counterpart, the standard Picturemate (without the viewer)seemed to top most categories. I bought the deluxe version and was absolutely impressed.
This is really a great printer. I actually used it without connecting to the pc and it works like a charm. It does tend to cut more of the top and bottom than I would like, but that’s a 4×6 for ya. My camera takes great pics and it’s really nice to see all that resolution come to life.
I don’t have the battery for it, but will get it soon. I might want to take this baby with me on a trip. The viewer is great and it allows you to crop your image. So if your pic is being cut too much or more than you’d like, you can select crop and move it to allow more of the top or bottom. It also allows zooming which turned out great on many of my pics. Though, I did notice some degredation the more zoomed in I was which is understandable.
I still love film, but this digital business is quite the competitor, especially when your prints look like they came from a lab.
Another great thing Epson came up with is to sell the ink with the glossy paper. It high quality paper (100 sheets)and will last you about the length of the supply of ink. For me, it’s actually made 130 prints on one cartridge, though I think that’s unusual. I had to go buy the paper which was rather expensive, about 17 bucks for the same 4×6. Oh well…
I highly reccomend. I’ve used Epson in the past and am glad I went with it again. (…)

Perfect!

  December 4, 2005
By Philip J. Pollina
My wife had been nagging me to print out the thousands of digital pictures I have taken, so I figured I try this little thing out. I have a large format Epson as well as a couple of HP photosmarts, but as everyone who prints knows, it is a real hassle to fire them up and get prints. This little gadget easily and quickly makes 4×6′s better than I have ever seen, including the local photolab. Bright, clear, sharp, and glossy. Unlike the previous reviewer, I have had no problem printing right from my 1 gig sd card.

Defective on arrival but now a happy customer

  July 13, 2005
By Robert M. Toups Jr.
July 14, 2005: I was very excited about purchasing this printer for my 26,000 photo collection shot with my Canon 10D & 20D, however the unit Amazon shipped me had a bad yellow print head. I ran through all the manufacturer steps to clean the print heads but to no avail. I also got a pack of paper/ink and tried the other ink cartridge. Still no luck. 20 sheets of nozzle tests and no yellow after numerous head cleanings. The pictures I did print were very sharp and the paper had a nice shine but because of bad yellow print head, they were all bluish purple in appearance. Yuck! I have packed it up and will be shipping it back to Amazon for a replacement. I will report back if I get a working unit when Amazon sends out the replacement unit.
July 19, 2005: I sent back the unit on July 15, 2005 via an Amazon directed UPS pickup and they are now showing they have received the defective unit and shipping next day saver the replacement unit at no cost. It’s nice they are shipping a new unit next day but they could have used a faster shipping method to retrieve it. I am a Prime member.
July 20, 2005: The replacement printer is here! I immediately unboxed it and ran the nozzle print test. All 6 colors showed up. I was happy! Then I hooked it up to my Mac that had the previous printer driver install and became frustrated. It would not print and claimed it couldn’t communicate with the printer. I tried two different USB cables (the printer does not come with one). Both failed. ARGH! I was seriously scratching my head wondering if I got another bum printer. Then I said “What the heck” and uninstalled the printer drivers and reinstalled them. Walla! Working PictureMate and boy does it work! The print outs are beautiful whether from iPhoto or Photoshop. So much nicer than the ink jet 4x6s from my Canon S900 using the special high end Canon Photo Pro Glossy — much cheaper too. I printed out 20 photos which took about 30 minutes (its not a speed demon) and compared them to photolab prints of the same photos. They compare nicely if not better. The paper feels firm and the colors are bright.
All in all, I feel satisfied with my purchase now that I have a working unit. Amazon handled the return of the defective printer in a timely manner even though I was a little impatient for my new camera toy. For some reason I cannot change the “Star” rating of my review. I would now bring it up to 5. This is a recommended purchase.

A no-headache piece of equipment.

  August 8, 2005
By David Difuntorum "Pro Shooter"
I’m a commercial photographer ([...]) and I’m completely happy with this thing. I shoot for a living, I have a total of 4 printers and I hate dealing with printing. The headache of calibrating everything so you can get nice pictures is the hidden cost of digital photography that’ll make you pull your hair out.
But I don’t have to deal with all that crap with this thing. I shoot. I stick in my CF card and the damn thing prints! Accurately! Consistently! Sweet!
If you’re into having a printer hooked up to your computer and you like going through all that irritating crap of screwing around on the computer then better you then me, man. I do it for a living and I wish all my professional printers were this easy to use.
I want to think about shooting and getting nice images out and not have to be a techie to do it.
I can concentrate on shooting and not have to fiddle with a stupid laptop or a computer or a color calibrating spyder or other crazy crap.
I shoot everything in Adobe 1998 on my two D70′s or in the big digital camera’s that I rent, (Go to shootsmarter.com for excellent tips from professionals to take your shooting to another level. Be aware, it can get hairy but then that’s why we get the big bucks, right?) and that really helps to make sure the colors are accurate and consistent.
Just be aware that this is an ink jet and it needs to go through a head cleaning process every now and then. It’s pretty easy to figure out that it needs a quick cleaning when you see banding or weird colors in odd places on the print.
I also noticed that it unless I’m printing a scene that has extremes of contrasts and exposures I have to increase brightness on the printer on all prints by two click things in the Photo fix menu.
By the way, when they say that the packaged paper/ink cart can push out 100 prints per box that means you stay away from the fancy schmancy Disney prints edges and stick with borders.
The battery is a huge hit with me. Spend the money if you want to take your camera and a printer to a family function. That little monitor rules, too. I like that I can sift through what I think is cool and make a print order along with adjustments to get a great image.
Another heads-up; you can choose which pictures to print while your shooting with your camera and then stick the card into the printer and it’ll print the whole set without you babysittiing the thing. But you can’t make print brightness adjustments beforehand.
I’ve started to use this thing to print up marketing pieces. Even a pro has a tough time seeing the difference between the print quality you get from this by itself and when you hook it up to a printer to get the extra dense printing quality.
This thing does one thing and one thing well: print excellent 4×6 glossy prints without a computer in a portable package.
Like I said, I want to take photos and see my images. Image capture to print latency sucks and this things helps me do what I really want to do; take pictures.

Best Portable Photo Printer Ever Made!

  July 12, 2007
By The Information
The discontinued Epson PictureMate Deluxe Viewer Edition Photo Printer is by far the finest consumer portable photo printer ever made (as of the this writing Thursday, July 12, 2007). Using a complex pigment 6-ink system these amazing prints are long-lasting, fade, water, and smudge proof! The 4×6 prints come out perfectly borderless and with amazing color after pushing a couple of buttons. Compared to the HP line, the Epson prints are simply superior, especially dark colors and overall contrast. If you use a digital camera 3 megapixels or higher, these prints easily rival developed photographs from film. I do give the HP line a better score for overall build and engineering, with features such as a metal carrying handle. I give this product 5 stars due to its overall output quality. Sifting through a folder of 500 prints is slow, and the unit might not recognize your memory card if its too big. Working around the slow user interface, the unit quickly becomes a friendly and powerful printing tool. Epson’s latest offerings (Snap) should be avoided since they are inferior to this discontinued product which can still be found at a great price. I recommend finding this older one and buying up the older ink kits and accessories such as the battery and carrying case. With any luck Epson will go back to where they once were, and release a version of this unit that can also print 5×7′s.

Excellent price, prints excellent photos

  December 15, 2005
By A. S. Johnson "seeking change"
We recently bought this printer, and have been very pleased with the product. It prints very hight quality photos, and has a lot of editing options available, so you don’t have to go to your computer first to edit. One drawback is, when we use a 1 gigabyte jmp drive, it searches the whole thing for photos, and this can take a while. At first we thought it wasn’t working, but it found all the photos, even searching all the subdirectories.
The printer is very easy to set up and very versatile, given that it prints up to 4×6 inch photos. So far, we’re quite happy with it.

Great printer!!

  October 13, 2005
By Chris T. Spediacci "spedi00"
The quality is fantastic. Only complaint is that the printer is a little slow. Otherwise, it’s simple to use, the colors do not smear and photo resolution is very close to any photo development center.

Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201)

Customer Reviews

THE perfect photo printer for serious amateur photographers.

  December 2, 2011
By Omega Man "Technoanalyst"
At school I’ve been using an Epson Stylus Pro 3880 and have gotten kind of addicted to printing my photos. The R3000 is half the cost and almost exactly the same except for it’s narrower 13″ maximum print width (vs the 17″ 3880). Both use the “UltraChrome K3 with Vivid Magenta” ink set which is the same one used by almost all of Epson’s “Pro” line of printers. Honestly, I don’t know why the R3000 isn’t in their “Pro” line since it could reasonably be used by a pro who never needed to print anything wider than 13″.
I printed some color test charts at the Sam’s Club photo lab (which should be reasonable quality since they actually calibrate their printers at least once a day and when they change paper rolls) and on my R3000, then compared them to an actual X-Rite produced ColorChecker chart, and the output from the R3000 significantly beats the output from Sam’s Fuji Frontier minilab photo printer. The Fuji Frontier print is noticeably duller with generally darker colors and a narrower range of saturated color reproduction. You don’t have to be a color expert to see the difference.
For the R3000 the ink cost is about $1/ml which comes out to about $0.01 per square inch if you get it at a discount (search for “red river Cost of Inkjet Printing Epson R3000″). That makes a borderless 8×10 cost about $0.80 in ink, and a borderless 8.5×11″ cost about $1 in ink. A sheet of Epson Ultra Premium Photo paper costs as little as $0.60 if you get it at a discount, so printing a borderless 8.5×11″ ends up costing as little as $1.60 in supplies. (Not to mention that you can get third-party paper that’s just as good or better than Epson’s official paper for less money.)
The cheapest photo labs charge around $1.50 for an 8×10 (my local Sam’s Club currently charges $1.46). If we use a whole 8.5×11 sheet of official paper and a full 8×10 worth of ink to print an 8×10, we get $1.40 in supplies per 8×10 which is slightly cheaper than even Sam’s Club and significantly higher quality. Good third-party paper would be around $0.35/sheet meaning that you could also do as well as $1.15 per 8×10, maybe even better.
Admittedly though that doesn’t incorporate the cost of the printer, which you won’t have to incur if you just use a photo lab. If you bought the printer for say $800 and you’ve gotten your per-8×10 supply costs down to $1.15, then you’d need to print about 2,580 8×10′s before your total costs started to get lower than Sam’s Club’s $1.46.
When you get larger than 8×10 though then the printer really starts to pay off. One place online that isn’t too expensive and has a good reputation charges $6.30 for a 12×18 on glossy photo paper printed with a photographic lab process. It’s possible to get decent 13×19″ gloss ink jet photo paper (same stuff that costs $0.35/sheet for the 8.5×11) for about $1.50/sheet. 12×18″ of ink costs you $2.16 so total cost for a 12×18 on the R3000 with that paper is $3.66. At that price you need to print 300 or so of these large prints before your prints start costing less than $6.30, and again the ink jet prints will have better color quality than the photographic process printer. You also have the entire lifetime of the printer to make all these prints that we’re talking about. If you make on average about 10 8×10″ prints every week then it would take about 5 years to make this cost back, but if you made two of the 12×18″ prints per week then it would take about 2.8 years to brake even compared to the lower quality protographic process prints ordered online.
But none of these estimates take into account the value of the convenience and additional quality you get from having a modern photo inkjet printer right in front of you. Add in costs like transportation to pick up photos, time spent driving, any sort of cost of inconvenience by having to wait for prints to arrive in the mail, the additional value of better color quality, and other hard to quantify things then the real savings may be better. Depending on how much these costs add to the cost of photo lab prints, a decent ink jet printer like this might pay for itself much more quickly.
Still, you have to keep in mind that owning your own printer like this only makes sense if you’re going to be doing a certain volume of printing. If you only ever print maybe 10 8x10s a month then the printer will never be worth it solely from a cost-per-print savings perspective. Also, if all you ever print is 4×6 then even just your ink cost without paper is going to be around 2.5x the cost of getting 4×6 prints made ata cheap online lab or drug store. So for small prints like 4×6 the printer will absolutely never pay for itself from the supply perspective, and probably not even from the convenience perspective.
The only problems I’ve heard of with this printer seem to involve priming the print head (pumping ink into the initially empty hoses that run from the ink cartridges to the print head, basically) and the printer going through unnecessary cleaning cycles, but Epson support is great about addressing these. My R3000 went though an unnecessary priming cycle when I first set it up, wasting about half the ink in the cartridges. Support got back to me in less than a day and offered to send me a full set of full replacement cartridges. I haven’t seen anyone complaining of clogged nozzles or any of the usual inkjet problems.
The color gamut of the R3000 when used with the Ultra Premium Photo paper significantly exceeds the AdobeRGB colorspace in areas of dark blues and greens. This allows you to make the most of your camera’s sensor capabilities IF you convert your RAW files into a format using the ProPhoto RGB color space (the most common one that actually holds those colors) AND print to the printer using proper color management with the appropriate ICC profile. Photo labs almost always require all files to be encoded as sRGB (which is smaller than both AdobeRGB and ProPhoto RGB), and printers like the Fuji Frontier have smaller gamuts than sRGB anyway, so they can’t possibly achieve the wide range of colors that a high quality professional inkjet can when it’s wielded by someone with sufficient color management skill.
Anyway, excellent printer, reasonable cost of ownership and operation, higher quality printing than you get at a photo lab, convenience, and excellent support from Epson. When you consider this part of your “digital darkroom” and compare its cost to the cost of materials and equipment you’d spend for an “old fashioned” film darkroom, the cost is quite reasonable.

Another fine Epson photo printer

  July 16, 2011
By Busy Executive
I’ve been a long-time user of the Epson R2880, but after several years of very heavy use, it was getting to be time to replace the print head. Since this is an expensive repair on my trusty old R2880, I decided it might be more cost efficient to go with an entirely new printer, and this led me to look at the R3000.
While I was replacing my printer, I figured I’d also take a look at the competing HP and Canon products. Side by side against the HP and Canon products, I found the Epson to be a shade better, especially with black-and-white prints. It’s not a dramatic difference, and maybe because I’m so used to the older R2880, I’m just biased towards Epson. Still, for me, it was enough to confirm my decision to go with the Epson R3000.
Compared to my R2880, it’s hard to see any obvious differences on the R3000 in terms of print quality. B&W mode seems very slightly better on the R3000, and at magnification, small details seem slightly sharper. Otherwise, colors and so-called “bronzing” are about the same to my eye. Not that this is a bad thing, since the R2880 is a very fine printer in its own right. The R3000 uses essentially the same ink technology as the R2880, so I suppose not seeing a dramatic difference is to be expected.
While I’m comparing to the R2880, physically, the R3000 is about an inch deeper, weighs slightly more and has more of a squarish look. Still, even though there are marginal print quality improvements at best, there are several features I found worthwhile compared to the earlier generation. Some little touches – the removable power cord, for example, are helpful. The larger ink capacity is a significant boost to me…I’m getting many times more prints per ink change, and that’s a good thing. I like the integrated LCD display, ink level monitors and control menus. Lets me put the printer far away from my computers and still be able to control it when I need to. And no more manual matte black/photo black switching is also a terrific feature, at long last.
Then there’s the built-in networking capability, something I’ve been wanting for a long time. I was able to position the printer in another room, turn on the WiFi support (right from the printer), and now I can print anywhere without buying any sort of add-on network server. Getting up and running was really simple. I print from both Macs and Windows PCs, and once I had the wireless configured, I was able to install the drivers on multiple computers with no trouble. Whole thing from opening the box to printing the first page was under 15 minutes, and most of that time was installing the ink cartridges.
Speaking of drivers, they seemed to work flawlessly on Mac OS X 10.6, Windows 7 and Windows Vista. I’ve printed with iPhoto, Aperture, PhotoShop 5 and Nikon’s Capture NX2 with no problems whatsoever. I’ve used the print profiles for all the papers I like to use, and am getting the results I expect. All in all, no surprises – and amazing prints.
I’d like to say that the construction quality is of a grade where the printer will last a long time, and for the most part, it is. If you print a medium number of prints, I’m sure this printer will last forever. Still, if you’re like me and you print hundreds of prints every week, then I suppose the consumable parts of the printer will wear out long before the rest of it does, as was the case with my R2880. To me, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing…I just assume I’m going to spend a few cents per page on printer hardware, and then I get to have the latest and greatest when they come along. At least until I find space for more of an industrial printer, like the Epson 7900 or something in that family.
Definitely recommended as the best 13×19 printer currently on the market.

Sweet Printer

  May 23, 2011
By Sam in Iowa
I am a serious amateur photographer. Recently my Epson R1800 printer died. Based on my experience with two previous Epson printers and my research, I decided to purchase the R3000. I have had the printer for a couple months now and I am quite happy with my purchase. A quick summary of my observations are as follows: 1) it was very easy to set up; 2) the print speed is so much faster than my R1800 even at the quality setting; 3) having choices for quality settings is great, but I notice little difference between the speed, quality and maximum quality settings; 4) the automatic changing of the black inks works quite well; 5)I have printed up to 11 x 14 size prints and they are excellent; 6) the larger ink cartridges are much more convenient to use; and 7) the on screen menus and the user manual are prepared in an intuitive fashion. The bottom line is you can’t go wrong with this printer.

fantastic prints, great price, handles many professional papers

  December 16, 2011
By Paul T. Stewart
I am an advanced amateur photographer, been shooting most of my life. [...] Due to budgetary constrictions, translation my sweet wife, I have been making a gradual move towards perfect color for the past 3-4 years. Perfection being unattainable of course, things you MUST have to get close to perfection include:
1) A good camera, tons of good stuff on the market from Nikon and Canon. I use a Nikon D300. Shoot RAW files btw, take my word for it, Google it, end of the day its like having a time machine for things like white balance, exposure compensation, saturation levels, black levels, fill light, recovery, vibrance and on and on and on. With lossy jpg files…good luck. You can always export jpgs from your RAW files, so shoot RAW.
2) A good monitor (doesn’t have to be a $2,500 – $5,000 Eizo save your money for things that will get you closer to perfection with more bang for your buck). I’m using a 27″ HD Viewsonic VX2739wm that is calibrated which leads me to #3.
3) A way to calibrate your monitor and printer (with Epson pro papers, the ICC profiles they provide via download work exceptionally well, but you still MUST calibrate your monitor) take my word for it; get the Color Munki Photo (under $500 now) and it works amazingly well. Better than devices costing 5 – 7 times more just a few short years ago.
4) Good photo editing software; I use Lightroom 3.3 and Photoshop CS5 but I have to tell you I spend 95% of my time in Lightroom so most bang for your buck is there. I use PS for retouching or being creative primarily, I never print from Photoshop. I always print from Lightroom, it has the best printing interface of anything on the market. If you are thinking yeah but I can’t softproof in lightroom, that leads me to #5.
5) Softproofing plugin for Lightroom: [...] This is a very important piece of the puzzle, if you don’t learn how to softproof, you will never get close to perfect color and contrast in your prints. Visit the Luminous Landscape web site and download ($44) their “From Camera to Print” video series. They are updating it from the version I have that was shot in 2007, worth every penny. I learned more about color calibration and getting great prints watching this series than everything else I have seen and read combined.
6) Professional paper, sorry you’re not getting close with that off-the-shelf coated crap from Staples or Walmart and you need a good printer to handle professional papers which leads to #7.
7) A good printer. The Epson R3000 fills the bill at a great price point. It uses the same print head, firmware and inks of printers costing thousands of dollars. If your print volume is low and 13″ wide (panorama’s up to 13 x 44) suits your need don’t even think about the 3880. It doesn’t handle roll paper (think canvas on hardboard or gallery wraps up to 11 x how long you want) or thicker fine art papers at all. The R3000 handles many more professional papers than the 3880 from Epson and from other manufacturers including Hahnemühle with ICC profiles for the R3000. Forget the Epson 4900 with 200 ml ink cartridges if your volume is low. Those cartridges will run you a thousand bucks or more to replace and if you don’t use them in a timely manner because you are terrified of the cost they could expire and do a wonderful job of clogging the print head. With a low volume you simply don’t need it.
I have nothing but praise for this printer. It is phenomenal. The roll feeder and WiFi are two great features. Check out RC Concepcion’s (Photoshop User Magazine) review of this printer on YouTube.
I have finally attained the contrast, color and black and white print quality I have been waiting for. Epson has bridged the gap for amateurs who want pro results with their prints with this printer.

In love….

  August 22, 2011
By Bloodnock
I decided on this printer after hours and hours of comparison research and
I have had no regrets since purchasing my unit from a most obliging retailer
via Amazon.
The first serious (and frightening) test of the R3000′s capabilities was for
an exhibition I had been invited to put together of images from a recent project.
I printed off 35 black and white photographs on Chromajet Metallic Pearl A3+ using
the printer’s own ‘Advanced B/W’ settings and the results were simply awesome!
The exhibition was a great success and I have since sold over 20 framed prints.
What excited me most was that the R3000 reproduced the images almost exactly as I
had intended, pushing it to the test with some quite unusual processing techniques.
A true testament to the R3000′s print quality and my love affair has only just begun!

A Great Printer For The MoneyThe Epson R3000 is a really great deal

  January 18, 2012
By Scott Bourne "Scott Bourne"
I’ve been using Epson printers since 1995. I’ve also owned other inkjet printers as well as a few of the old dye-sub printers. The Epson products have a reputation for offering a great deal of bang for the buck so I was excited to get my hands on an R3000 to see how things have progressed for Epson.
The R3000 is an A3+ printer that has been available since March, 2011. It’s a pro-sumer model that many serious enthusiasts as well as professionals might find appealing. It uses Epson’s UltraChrome K3 ink set which costs approximately $229 to replace. The new 25.9 ml ink tanks were easy to install.
Unboxing the printer I was VERY glad that my assistant was here to help. This thing is a beast. You will need a substantial amount of space and a very sturdy desk or table to use it. It’s well made and solid.
You can feed paper through a front-loading paper path or a rear tray. The front paper path is for fine art papers. You can also use roll paper although I did not test installing the rollers. Likewise, you can print to CD but again, since that’s not something I need to do I didn’t test that function either.
Setup is a bit daunting if you are like me, and got tricked into installing Lion on your Mac. You should NOT insert the disk that comes with the printer if you are running Lion. Go to Epson’s site and download the drivers, utilities and ICC profiles from there. Install them and THEN turn on the printer’s power. After about a 10-minute wait the inks are installed and primed. Then you can decide how you want to communicate with the printer. You can use a USB cable, network cable or wireless. Since I placed the printer outside my office in the studio, I used WIFI. You can connect to the router directly through the printer’s own interface or connect a computer to the printer one time to speed that process up. I just used the printer’s front control panel interface to type in the password to my router and all was well on the first try.
While I do consider myself a master printer when it comes to a wet darkroom, I don’t do enough of it on the digital side to know as much as some of the real artists and experts. Believe me when I tell you printing is as much an art as shooting. But I do know what I like and my initial test prints were quite nice.
I tested a variety of papers from Ilford, Red River and Epson. There were ICC profiles for all the paper so it was easy to match the images I saw on my Apple LED Cinema Display, calibrated by an X-Rite iOne system.
Depending on the paper, you can get very sharp prints – if that is what you are after. There are many art papers, even metal papers available so I will experiment with all and get a detailed review of the papers up later.
The paper handling and loading was a breeze – once you read the manual. Print times were reasonably fast, ink coverage – again depending on the paper selected – was great and color gamut was very wide. The blacks were very black but occasionally a bit blocky.
There was no banding or metamerism on the black and white prints I made. Most prints were very consistent from print to print but there were occasionally very small variances that most people would not notice.
CONCLUSION
The Epson R3000 is a really great deal. Considering the cost to replace all nine ink carts is rather high, that really great deal becomes just a great deal but a great deal nonetheless. I don’t do a ton of my own printing but I am satisfied that anything under 13×19″ can be easily handled by the R3000 and that the print quality will be first-rate.
Highly recommended. I’d give it five stars if the ink weren’t so expensive.

The Best

  January 2, 2012
By Dan De Lion "Professional Photographer"
As a pro I have extremely high quality standards – the R3000 meets those standards and delivers marvelous B&W prints and perfect color prints.
Home printing requires a good monitor and good paper profiles from the manufacturer. Profiling your monitor helps immensely with any printer. However, most amateurs aren’t going to do that. Epson’s paper profiles are good and you should try to adjust your monitor to see the same thing that’s on the finished print. Make sure you let the print dry throughly before judging it. A couple of hours or a hairdryer will vastly improve the prints looks.
Ink costs about 75 cents for a full bleed 8.5×11 inch print. First rate paper varies from 20 cents to a dollar a sheet. The R3000 is quite efficient in its use of ink compare to earlier Epson printers. However, constantly changing from matte paper to glossy paper and then back to matte will cost you about $4 for each round trip in wasted ink. So, you’re better off sticking to one surface or another. Try Epson’s “Ultra Premium Presentation Matte” – 20 cents/sheet, archival, nice looking surface.
The printer works via either a wi-fi connection or a hard wired USB connection.

It is worh the Extra Cost

  April 4, 2011
By D. Kinberg "David"
I am an Amateur photographer who happened to take some really nice pictures on a recent trip. I took my digital pictures to two different high end photo stores and they did not even come close to capturing the vibrancy of each picture. Photogrpahy is a hobby and it now looks like printing will be a hobby as well. Over 4 days, I did intensive research, spoke to several speciality photo stores and was ready to buy the Epson R 2880. It was about $300 less and for this differenc in price appeared to be the better deal. However, as my research continued and I kept reading review after review about the small ink containers in the Epson R 2880 and that in order to print Matte B & W, this required a change of cartridges. While changing a cartridge was fine, the nozzle also had to flushed and cleaned and this caused a waste of ink. Due to the high price of ink, the small cartridges, changing Matte and glossy black, I cancelled the Epson R 2880 and took the plunge to the R3000.
After much research, it is my opinion that if you thinking about Epson photoprinters (R2880 and R3000), I would recommend giving serious thought before buying the R2880.
Thank you,
David

Epson Stylus Photo R1900 Large Format Photo Printer (C11C698201)


Customer Reviews

State of the Art

  March 2, 2008
By Howard W.
I’ll start with a short review since I just got the printer and have only run 5 prints through it. I will update in a week or so with more information.
Setup and installation was easy. I have it on my network for my Windows machines and it is connected directly to my Mac Pro. The install documentation said to get the latest driver for Leopard off of their site, which I did and installed with no problem. The latest Windows driver was on the installation CD.
The reason I called this review “State of the Art” is Epson developed Radiance, the new color-matching technology built into the R1900. This is the first printer with it, even the current Epson Pro printers don’t have it. [...] has an article about it.
The few pictures I have printed are beautiful and they printed very fast.
I printed 3 on Epson’s Ultra Premium luster 8.5 x 11 paper using Photoshop CS2. I tried different settings for each print of the same standard color matching target. All three printed very nice and as expected, a little different. Using “Photoshop Determines Colors”, “Printer Determines Colors” and “No Color Management”, with appropriate settings on the printer driver. So it will be up to you to decide which settings you want to use.
Next, as a test I printed a photo, of my daughter, on plain HP Bright White paper. WOW, is all I can say. Plain paper and it looked great.
For my last test I picked a random paper size, 12″ x 12″, that I cut from a 13″ x 19″ sheet of matte paper. I changed the paper size in the driver and printed. No problem, it printed just fine and also was beautiful.
I plan on getting a roll of paper too. I’ve wanted to print some banners, something I couldn’t do with my current Canon I9900.
So far it is everything I expected it to be. However, I do plan on keeping the I9900 because sometimes I know I will want a dye (not pigment) print (and I still have Canon ink and paper left).
I will post more soon.
Update 3-10-08:
I have been playing with the settings on the driver to see which I like best. It is a good/bad thing that there are so many settings to play with. I figure I will eventually figure out which I like best. There are subtle differences in color, skin tones and gray scales on the gray scales. If you are interested in the test targets, you can download the printer test images I used from [...]
I will start printing some of my real pictures to compare with the I9900 versions. So I will post another update in a week or two.
I tried a roll in the printer. It was surprising easy to set up and use. You put the holders on the roll, mount it on the back of the printer, then feed the paper into the printer in the slot on the back. The printer recognizes you are doing it, then grabs the paper to feed in to the proper starring point.
If you print multiple images, the printer spaces them 1″ apart. Unfortunately, Epson still has it’s artificial limit length of 44″. There are expensive RIPs (raster image processors) that will allow you to printer longer images, but unless you are going to do this a lot, it can’t be worth it. The cheapest I found is $500.
I’ve decided that I probably will not use the “roll” on the printer. I want to printer banners every so often, but to use the roll for one print wastes about 10″ of paper. That is the initial feed of about 4″ and when you cut it on the back to free it, another 6″. If you are printing many prints on a roll, then it will be worth it and easier. I suggest (and what I did in my second test), was just cut a 44″ of paper (from the roll) and feed it though the (normal) auto paper feeder and that worked fine for the banner without any waste.
As for ink usage, I’ve hardly made a dent with the 10 8x10s, 1 12×12, 3 8.5 x 44 prints I’ve made. The banners were not printed at high resolution to save ink for my testing. I love Amazon, but it’s ink prices for this printer are currently way out of line. Even the Epson store has them for way less. I hope that changes soon.
Update 3-26-08 (my last update).
After printing 25 more 8×10 high resolution (and in slow mode for better quality), I finally ran out of ink in one cartridge (and it was the gloss optimizer). After more reading, I think I used the wrong setting for the gloss and was wasting it on white area outside of the image. I’m still learning.
Some of the other inks are pretty low, so I have stocked up.
I still have not printed on a DVD/CD yet, but I’m sure that will be fine.
There is not much more for me to say except I am very happy with this purchase and expect to use this printer for the next 3-4 years, when I’m sure something else out there will get my attention.
Update 3-22-11
Epson just announced the R3000. By the specs, it looks to be the replacement for the R1900. The list price of the R3000 is $850 but the R3000 comes with and uses the Epson UltraChrome K3 ink set, which are the larger inks that cost $40-$50, but are 8x larger than the R1900 inks, which meant to me when I got the R3880 (that use the same ink), that the savings in ink will pay for the printer over the R1900.
Howard

Better than I hoped

  June 28, 2008
By Dwight R. Schofield "DSRay Studio"
I have had this printer for a week now and all I can say is WOW! I was concerned after I read the reviews here but decided to buy anyway because of past experience with Epson, and I am so happy I did.
When the box arrived I picked up the ‘Start Here’ booklet and within an hour and three prints (13″x19″) I was getting better results than the stuff I had paid a professional lab $15.00 each for! No more, I just fired my lab.
I am printing from Photoshop CS3 using Adobe RGB color space and ICC information. The prints are incredibly color saturated with great contrast to really ‘pop’.
I am absolutely in love with this printer!
Another week:
No change in my opinion, other than I like it even more. I printed 20 8×10 and 7 13×19 before having to add ink (Yellow and Cyan). Prints on Epson’s fine art paper are fantastic! This is my last review.

Satisfies even this professional photographer.

  November 24, 2009
By J.L.
I have long been invested in a competitor’s brand when it came to high-quality inkjet printing, and making the switch to not only a new printer but also a new vendor was a tough decision. As a professional photographer (Member, NPPA), I carefully coordinate ICC color profiles for true color fidelity from lens to monitor to print. No sub-$2000 printer – until now – has ever satisfied me. Epson’s R1900 is a STEAL even at full retail price. The color fidelity, gamut, and smooth skin tones are unmatched and are more true to life than the professional digital printing service that I formerly used (and have since fired). Your operating costs are not going to be as low as if you purchase a cheap big-box-store style photo printer – you’ll go through ink faster than with other brands (especially the Gloss Optimizer, which covers the entire print with a fantastic gloss coat when selected, but which is fortunately sold in a low-cost 4-pack). Even with higher ink costs, if you’re looking at this product, you’re probably already ready to take your game to the next level. Although this printer will produce stunning prints on any media, you really need to try printing on Epson paper with Epson’s ICC profiles installed – words cannot describe the quality of the prints produced. The first 11×14 I printed not only took my breath away but also that of the fellow professional photographers staring over my shoulder. The Gloss Optimizer cartridge and newly formulated inks are a clear improvement over this model’s predecessor (R1800) and produce fantastic glossy prints. You have to see it to believe it – you will not be disappointed. Also consider purchasing paper and ink directly from the Epson store – the prices are better than I have found elsewhere online – and there are frequently sales on their higher-end papers that make the per-print cost much lower.

An Incredible Printer!

  October 22, 2008
By Kathy Parsons
I have to say that this printer has been blowing me away! I have been thinking about getting a larger-format photo printer for some time, as my Epson Stylus CX5200 is getting tired and outdated. I am using the R1900 with an iMac and OSX 10.4.9. My camera is a Canon PowerShot SD900 (10.0 MP).
I expected the printer to come with some paper samples to try, so I didn’t order large-format paper until I received the printer and found that there were NOT any samples. So, I played around with some paper I had on hand until the bigger paper came. First, I printed out a flyer for a concert that contained both text and a color photo. Like another reviewer, at first I didn’t realize how many different settings there are for print and paper quality. Using bright white paper and a “photo paper setting” on the computer, the photo was disappointingly flat. I looked around the menu options on the computer, and under the “print settings” menu, I could go with “Plain/Bright White Paper,” and then the print quality was excellent.
One application that I haven’t seen mentioned here (it’s specialized, I know!) is printing sheet music. My CX5200 often splits the lines or gets kind of fuzzy if the ink is starting to get low, but with bright white paper or heavier, the R1900 prints out incredibly clear music notation – something I will use it for often.
The large photo paper I ordered in sheet form is Ilford Premium Photo Pearl Paper in 13″X19″ size. Two shots were of the beach and one was of an iris that I took on a macro setting. All three came out spectacular. The detail of the flower is just incredible, as is the purple color.
Next I tried some Epson borderless 4″X6″ premium glossy photo paper. I printed out some color shots and a black and white one – all superlative. I didn’t encounter any drops of ink on the edges of the photos as was mentioned by someone earlier.
Then I tried a shot of my black and brown dog on the beach on Kodak Premium Picture Paper that is 8 1/2″X11″. That’s the only print I’m a little disappointed with, but, to be fair, this is an older package of photo paper that might have been improved over the past several years. All of the rest of the prints have been dry to the touch as soon as I took them out of the printer, but this print still feels kind of damp after more than an hour.
I’m still in shock (GOOD shock!) about the last three prints I did, which were on Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper on a 13″X32.8′ roll. One is a shot I took with the zoom on my camera of a harbor seal sunning itself in the surf. The details on the animal and the water are eye-popping. The second one was of two brown pelicans flying over the surf (I live on the Oregon Coast and that’s where I take most of my photos!) – again, breathtaking detail in the wings of the birds as well of the movement of the water. The third is again of the ocean, but this one is almost all blues of varying shades and large areas of sky. This was a good test, because often on other printers, large areas of smooth textures end up with lines or other imperfections in the prints. This one is perfect.
I just checked the ink levels, and not surprisingly, the blue and black are low, but I’ve printed quite a few very large prints without any problems. It would be nice if the ink levels stayed high forever, but for the money I’m saving in not having to send out for enlargements, I’m happy.
I feel very confident that I could enter these prints in a competition and do well. Guess what everyone is getting for Christmas! I give this printer both thumbs up and highly recommend it. My only word of caution is to be sure your camera has enough MPs to enlarge the prints to the maximum level. One of the reasons I bought this particular camera is that the prints are supposed to be clear up to 16″X20″. Not all digital cameras can do that. I’ll keep my CX5200 for everyday printing, but all of the important things will go through the R1900. Love it!!!

Ink and media loading issues

  September 23, 2009
By Sanity Advocate
I’ve owned this printer for about a year now and I think it performs reasonably well.
There are two significant issues with the unit I own:
1) Occasionally it will refuse to recognize a replaced cartridge, but Epson has been very good about sending free replacements. The only issue is the waste of time and frustration when this happens. So far it happened to me on two occasions. Both times Epson replaced the defective cartiridges overnight. I did not even have to call them, just send them an e-mail and get a very quick response.
2) I wasted half a roll of canvas trying to load it as per Epson instructions. The unit would accept the edge of the roll, but as I would send a print job in, it would report a media jam every time. Pressing the jam clearing button would result in the printer advancing a blank piece of canvas forward, while the roll back-up button would do nothing and I would have to pull the canvas out of the unit manually, damaging the canvas in the process and risking destroying the printer as well. I tried to follow Epson instructions twice with the same result and then decided to pre-cut the canvas roll to pieces of required length and feed them via a cut-sheet feeder. This approach worked like a charm – no jams and no problems. I got great prints of any length I needed. I will never use the crappy roll feeding system on this unit again.
I gave the unit 4 stars to account for the two issues above.